IB vs. Cambridge: What I’ve Noticed in Class
A discussion in Cambridge / IB / Merdeka Curriculum on the SpeakWise Indonesia teacher forum.
So, I've been reflecting on the differences between the IB and Cambridge English programs while teaching here in Indonesia, and I thought I’d share a bit. Last Tuesday, I had a class of Year 11s that highlighted some key contrasts. In the IB program, my students tend to engage more deeply with the material. For instance, we were discussing a poem, and I found that they were really eager to connect it with their own experiences. It felt like they were not just memorizing for exams but actually processing the content, and honestly, it was refreshing to see that level of engagement.
On the other hand, with Cambridge, I notice a stronger emphasis on preparing for assessments. My Year 10s are more focused on grammar rules and writing structured essays. To be fair, that practice really sharpens their language skills, but sometimes it lacks that personal touch. It’s like they’re ticking boxes instead of genuinely exploring ideas.
I’ve been trying to incorporate more reflective activities with my Cambridge classes, like asking them to write a reflective journal about their thoughts on a topic, not just the facts. And it’s been nice to see some growth in their willingness to share more personal insights. I guess it’s all about finding that balance, right? Just wanted to share what’s been working for me!
1 reply
Jake O'Brien — Senior Teacher
I totally get what you’re saying about IB students engaging deeply. I’ve noticed the same thing when we analyze texts; they bring so many perspectives to the table. Honestly, though, I've also seen some Cambridge kids take the material just as seriously but in a different way. They tend to focus more on the mechanics and structure, which can be useful too. But yeah, the IB's emphasis on personal connection often leads to richer discussions. Do you think it's the curriculum or the students' mindset that makes that difference?